From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261725AbULGA52 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:57:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261726AbULGA52 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:57:28 -0500 Received: from bgm-24-94-57-164.stny.rr.com ([24.94.57.164]:49374 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261725AbULGA5Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:57:25 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] dynamic syscalls revisited From: Steven Rostedt To: Michael Buesch Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <200412070120.05996.mbuesch@freenet.de> References: <1101741118.25841.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041205234605.GF2953@stusta.de> <1102349255.25841.189.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200412070120.05996.mbuesch@freenet.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Kihon Technologies Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:57:24 -0500 Message-Id: <1102381044.25841.230.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 01:20 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to do a > cond_syscall(sys_dsyscall) > in kernel/sys_ni.c > You learn something everyday! Thanks, -- Steve