From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261688AbULJFPW (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:15:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261724AbULJFPW (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:15:22 -0500 Received: from bgm-24-94-57-164.stny.rr.com ([24.94.57.164]:64130 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261688AbULJFPR (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:15:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-6 From: Steven Rostedt To: Bill Huey Cc: Mark Johnson , Ingo Molnar , Amit Shah , Karsten Wiese , Adam Heath , emann@mrv.com, Gunther Persoons , "K.R. Foley" , LKML , Florian Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano , Lee Revell , Rui Nuno Capela , Shane Shrybman , Esben Nielsen , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Schmidt In-Reply-To: <20041210050126.GA30282@nietzsche.lynx.com> References: <20041210050126.GA30282@nietzsche.lynx.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Kihon Technologies Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:14:16 -0500 Message-Id: <1102655656.3238.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 21:01 -0800, Bill Huey wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:23:38PM -0600, Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com wrote: > > I may take this "off line" if it goes on too much longer. A little > > "view of the customer" is good for the whole group, but if it > > gets too much into my specific application, I don't see the benefit. > > Taking offline would cut the rest of the developers off from having > any empirical data to work with. It's a bad idea. The entire point > of the RT kernel and app is to characterize the behavior of the system > so that fringe events happen and so that they can be tracked down and > eventually solved. Continue on IMO. :) I second the motion. It's a fun read ;-) (just my 0.02 cents) -- Steve