From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261388AbULXLBd (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:01:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261391AbULXLBd (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:01:33 -0500 Received: from viefep13-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.15]:65077 "EHLO viefep13-int.chello.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261388AbULXLBc (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:01:32 -0500 Subject: Re: USB storage (pendrive) problems From: Attila BODY To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20041221131534.411e3553@lembas.zaitcev.lan> References: <1103579679.23963.14.camel@localhost> <200412202325.20064.andrew@walrond.org> <41C75E8B.1020200@osdl.org> <20041221131534.411e3553@lembas.zaitcev.lan> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 12:23:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1103887384.10838.1.camel@thunder> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 13:15 -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Thanks for the note. Unfortunately, 2.6.9 apparently has problems with > its virtual memory and write throttling, so I'm sure a few people suffering > from it will jump on this thread. It's essential to split root causes. > Your case may be different from the original poster's, who apparently > had the same deal with both ub and usb-storage. First things first, did > you try to set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB to off? What happens if you do? It works then, so the problem seems to be with the ub driver, but it is still a question why the 1.1 device seems to wprk better with it. brgds, compi