From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261431AbULXSlG (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:41:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261432AbULXSlG (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:41:06 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:14733 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261431AbULXSlF (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:41:05 -0500 Subject: Re: VM fixes [1/4] From: Lee Revell To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <20041224182031.GG13747@dualathlon.random> References: <20041224173519.GB13747@dualathlon.random> <20041224100016.530a004c.davem@davemloft.net> <20041224182031.GG13747@dualathlon.random> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:41:03 -0500 Message-Id: <1103913664.3921.2.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 19:20 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Yep, I remeber this was the case in some old alpha. But did they > support smp too? I can't see how that old hardware could support smp. > If they're UP they're fine. Isn't there still a race with PREEMPT? Or am I missing something? Lee