From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261247AbUL1Vmu (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:42:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261262AbUL1Vmu (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:42:50 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:56746 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261247AbUL1Vmt (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:42:49 -0500 Subject: Re: Real-time rw-locks (Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-15) From: Lee Revell To: Esben Nielsen Cc: Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Rui Nuno Capela , "K.R. Foley" , Fernando Lopez-Lezcano , Mark Johnson , Amit Shah , Karsten Wiese , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , emann@mrv.com, Gunther Persoons , LKML , Florian Schmidt , Shane Shrybman , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Schmidt In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:42:44 -0500 Message-Id: <1104270164.20714.31.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 17:23 +0100, Esben Nielsen wrote: > I am afraid NVidia cards and preempt realtime is far in the future :-( Not necessarily. I am sure many of Nvidia's potential customers want to do high end simulation and that requires an RT capable OS and good graphics hardware. If many people end up using RT preempt for high end simulator applications, like several who have posted on this list, then it seems like it would a good fit. Lee