From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] disallow modular capabilities
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:09:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1104872943.8346.30.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0501041303190.2294@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 13:05 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> > And I posted this to LKML almost a week ago, and a real fix was posted
> > in response.
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/28/112
>
> Well, I realize that it has been on bugtraq, but does that make it a real
> concern? I'll make the tristate a boolean, but has anybody half-way sane
> ever _done_ what is described by the bugtraq posting? IOW, it looks pretty
> much like a made-up example, also known as a "don't do that then" kind of
> buglet ;)
Well, a buglet is still a type of bug ;-)
What's wrong with Serge's patch? I don't see any downside.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/29/59
Lee
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-02 20:00 [PATCH] disallow modular capabilities Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-02 20:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-02 20:28 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-02 20:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-02 20:47 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-02 22:36 ` David Meybohm
2005-01-02 23:30 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-03 0:21 ` David Meybohm
2005-01-03 0:32 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-03 14:38 ` Florian Weimer
2005-01-03 15:52 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-04 20:24 ` Lee Revell
2005-01-04 21:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-04 21:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-04 21:31 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-04 21:09 ` Lee Revell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1104872943.8346.30.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox