Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

Chris Wright
2005-01-11T20:47:13Z

* Lee Revell (rlrevell@joe-job.com) wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 12:05 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > Anyway, *plonk*.
>
> Plonk? WTF? Jack comes up with what many people think is a reasonable
> solution to a real problem, that affects thousands of users, and in the
> middle of what seems to me a civilized discussion, you killfile him
> because he disagrees with you?
>
> Plonk to you too, asshole.

Guys, could we please bring this back to a useful discussion. None of
you have commented on whether the rlimits for priority are useful. As I
said before, I've no real problem with the module as it stands since it's
tiny, quite contained, and does something people need. But I agree it'd
be better to find something that's workable as long term solution.

thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net