From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261334AbVAGJpU (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:45:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261335AbVAGJpU (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:45:20 -0500 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:50852 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261334AbVAGJpI (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:45:08 -0500 Subject: Re: mysterious /proc//maps breakage with static binaries in 2.6.10-mm2 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <1105088656.11504.14.camel@localhost> References: <1105088099.11504.12.camel@localhost> <1105088656.11504.14.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:45:04 -0800 Message-Id: <1105091105.6910.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 (2.0.3-0.mozer.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 01:04 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 00:54 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > 2.6.10-mm1 works fine (hm, better check, but it doesn't cause Valgrind > > to spectacularly explode like this does, so I assume its basically OK), > > so this is something new. > > Hm, I never got around to running -mm1 (compiled it, but mm2 appeared > before I booted it). So this is vs. plain 2.6.10. I'll try -mm1. -mm1 is fine. J