public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: linux-os@analogic.com
Cc: bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, David Vrabel <dvrabel@cantab.net>,
	aryix <aryix@softhome.net>,
	lug-list@lugmen.org.ar,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dmesg: PCI interrupts are no longer routed automatically.........
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:38:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1105393108.29910.60.camel@eeyore> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501051251140.9762@chaos.analogic.com>

On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 13:15 -0500, linux-os wrote:
> The problem is that the PLX-9656BA INTCSR is not in configuration
> space, but runtime registers off a BAR. The interrupt source
> can be from a PLD that hasn't even had its microcode loaded
> yet!
> 
> FYI, the PLX or similar clone is the bus interface chip for many
> busmastering PCI boards.
> 
> > You wouldn't want your ISR mucking around with a half-initialized
> > device, so does it have to check a "device_configured" flag
> > or something?
> 
> Yes. If the device isn't configured, the ISR reads all the INTCSR
> bits, then writes 0 to the register to prevent anything else.

The PLX might be a common device, but it sounds like this
particular issue depends on the design of the rest of the
board.  And presumably, nobody who cared about performance
would design a board with this property, right?  I mean, to
add a test in the ISR for a condition that exists only for
a few milliseconds at driver startup-time seems sub-optimal.

> If the PLX had been reset, then the INTCSR bits would all
> be masked off. However, reset is really only guaranteed from
> power OFF on some motherboards, in particuar the ones with
> so-called "hot-swap" capabilites fail. There is a software
> reset that, in fact, even reloads its serial EEPROM. However,
> the BAR needs to be accessible for this to be used.
> 
> So it would be wonderful if the correct IRQ could be made
> available before the chip could generate an interrupt.

If we exposed a new pcibios_route_irq() (to hide the arch-
specific nature of IRQ routing via ACPI or other information),
could you do what you need in a pci_fixup_early quirk?



  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-10 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-29  9:55 dmesg: PCI interrupts are no longer routed automatically aryix
2005-01-04 18:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-01-04 18:53   ` linux-os
2005-01-04 19:41     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-01-04 19:55       ` linux-os
2005-01-05  9:40         ` David Vrabel
2005-01-05 12:06           ` linux-os
2005-01-05 17:13             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-01-05 18:15               ` linux-os
2005-01-10 21:38                 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2005-01-10 22:03                   ` linux-os

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1105393108.29910.60.camel@eeyore \
    --to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=aryix@softhome.net \
    --cc=dvrabel@cantab.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
    --cc=lug-list@lugmen.org.ar \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox