public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dimitris Lampridis <soth@softhome.net>
To: linux-os@analogic.com
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI lost interrupts and PLX chips
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:58:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1105621134.3203.22.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501130728520.10535@chaos.analogic.com>

First of all, thanks for your concern.

On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 14:49, linux-os wrote:
> You can look at /proc/interrupts to see if your device ever interrupted.
> If it did, then got shut off, you probably forgot to return IRQ_HANDLED
> in the interrupt-service-routine. The newer code requires a return-value
> from the ISR.
> 
No interrupt at /proc/interrupts. The ISR never gets called. If it
would, it returns IRQ_HANDLED.
As I mentioned on the first mail, using a logical analyzer I saw the
device generating interrupts behind the PCI bridge, but I didn't see
them pass through the bridge, so I didn't expect to read something at
/proc/interrupts.

> If it got a bunch of spurious interrupts that made it impossible
> to initialize the device properly, then use some flag to tell
> your ISR that the device wasn't enabled yet. If it got an interrupt
> before the device was enabled, the ISR writes 0 to the PLX CSR after
> reading and throwing away the existing value. That will quiet the
> device until it can be properly initialized.
> 
Same here, ISR never gets called.

> If you never got any interrupts, then you have some other bug.
> You can readily force the PLX to generate interrupts for testing
> purposes.

How can I do that? Don't bother explaining everything. Maybe a link 
to somewhere on the net where I can learn more?

Thanks,
Dimitris


      reply	other threads:[~2005-01-13 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-12 23:38 PCI lost interrupts and PLX chips Dimitris Lampridis
2005-01-13 11:49 ` linux-os
2005-01-13 12:04   ` Dimitris Lampridis
2005-01-13 12:49     ` linux-os
2005-01-13 12:58       ` Dimitris Lampridis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1105621134.3203.22.camel@localhost \
    --to=soth@softhome.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox