Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

Paul Davis
2005-01-07T15:42:25Z

>> well thats good, i hope someone updated the man page too :)
>>
>> but is there actually any way to grant specific users a reasonable
>> rlimit,
>
>yes; most distributions will use pam for this, you can set per user or per
>gorup limits there.

isn't that a uid/gid based system? ok, i'm being a little snide :)

fine, so the mlock situation may have improved enough post-2.6.9 that
it can be considered fixed. that leaves the scheduler issue. but
apparently, a uid/gid solution is OK for mlock, and not for the
scheduler. am i missing something?

--p