public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanspeter Kunz <hkunz@ailab.ch>
To: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc1 (ACPI related problems)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:37:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1105655832.8599.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1105515143.2734.6.camel@lb.loomes.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2124 bytes --]

And I see these errors on i386:

ACPI-1138: *** Error: Method execution failed
[\_SB_.PCI0.LPC0.EC0_.EC8C] (Node c17ee940), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
ACPI-1138: *** Error: Method execution failed
[\_SB_.PCI0.LPC0.EC0_.EC04] (Node c17eeba0), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
ACPI-1138: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.ECPF] (Node
c17ded20), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
ACPI-1138: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BATA._BIF] (Node
c17f3c00), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT

consequently, my /proc/acpi/battery/ is empty. 

Further, when I go to S3 the system does not enter sleep mode (as it did
with 2.6.10).

Otherwise it runs without problems.

cheers,
Hp.

On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 08:32 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> I see these errors in dmesg on an AMD_64:
> 
> ACPI: Subsystem revision 20041210
> ACPI: Interpreter enabled
> ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
>     ACPI-1138: *** Error: Method execution failed [\MCTH] (Node
> ffff81003ff8ecc0), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
>     ACPI-1138: *** Error: Method execution failed [\OSFL] (Node
> ffff81003ff8ed00), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
>     ACPI-1138: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0._S3D]
> (Node ffff81003ff82140), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
>     ACPI-0158: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0._S3D]
> (Node ffff81003ff82140), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
> 
> But the system is running fine AFAICT.
> 
> __  
> Markus
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Hanspeter Kunz                  Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Ph.D. Student                   Department of Information Technology
Email: hkunz@ailab.ch           University of Zurich
Tel: +41.(0)44.63-54306         Andreasstrasse 15, Office 2.12
http://ailab.ch/people/hkunz    CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland

Spamtraps: hkunz.bogus@ailab.ch hkunz.bogus@ifi.unizh.ch
---
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you place the blame.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-13 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-12  5:09 Linux 2.6.11-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2005-01-12  7:07 ` Keith Owens
2005-01-12  7:32 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2005-01-13 22:37   ` Hanspeter Kunz [this message]
2005-01-12  8:24 ` Brice Goglin
2005-01-12  9:20   ` Tino Keitel
2005-01-12  9:38     ` Brice Goglin
2005-01-12 14:13       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-12 14:35         ` Brice Goglin
2005-01-12 15:50   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-12 19:13     ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-12 15:24 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2005-01-12 15:32   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-12 15:44     ` Gene Heskett
2005-01-12 16:03     ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2005-01-13  9:45     ` NUMA or not on dual Opteron (was: Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc1) Sander
2005-01-13 10:02       ` NUMA or not on dual Opteron Raphael Jacquot
2005-01-13 17:07         ` Justin M. Forbes
2005-01-13 19:43           ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-13 19:40         ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-13 15:36       ` NUMA or not on dual Opteron (was: Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc1) Alan Cox
2005-01-13 19:38       ` NUMA or not on dual Opteron Andi Kleen
2005-01-15 23:42         ` Sander
2005-01-13 21:24       ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-01-14  8:04         ` David Schwartz
2005-01-14  8:10           ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-14  8:48           ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-12 19:06 ` Linux 2.6.11-rc1 -- usb_storage and Genesys Jan De Luyck
2005-01-13  5:42 ` [PATCH] contort getdents64 to pacify gcc-2.96 Adam Kropelin
2005-01-13  3:51   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-13 23:15 ` Linux 2.6.11-rc1 (compile stats) John Cherry
2005-01-16  9:22 ` Cross-compilation broken (was: Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc1) Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-01-16 16:09   ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-01-17  9:00     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-01-19 21:07 ` Linux 2.6.11-rc1 Daniel Gryniewicz
2005-01-20  4:16   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-20  4:49     ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2005-01-20  7:17       ` Peter Osterlund
2005-01-20 15:01         ` Romano Giannetti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1105655832.8599.8.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=hkunz@ailab.ch \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox