From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@linuxtv.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Mws <mws@twisted-brains.org>,
linux-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DVB at76c651.c driver seems to be dead code
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:23:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1108124605.3535.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050211094934.GO2958@stusta.de>
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 10:49 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> If I understand it correctly, there are several drivers that only make
> sense if they are used together. at76c651.c alone makes zero sense?
> This means it would be highly appreciated to have all parts inside the
> kernel at some time in the future.
It makes sense if
- the dbox2 core code gets merged into mainline, which is our goal, but
can take a huge amount of time.
- someone rips off the frontend module of a dbox2 and puts it on his
PCI DVB card because this Atmel chip rocks so much :-)
It will require only very few changes to the PCI driver...
- or a company decides to use this chip on their brand new DVB-C device
and john doe decides to write a Linux driver for it. He will then
notice that there is already a driver for the frontend module and can
therefore save a lot of work.
> Something different:
> The atmel at76c651 frontend driver is specific to the MPC823
> architecture?
no.
Regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-11 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-10 23:56 DVB at76c651.c driver seems to be dead code Adrian Bunk
2005-02-11 1:11 ` Mws
2005-02-11 9:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-02-11 12:23 ` Andreas Oberritter [this message]
2005-02-11 9:36 ` [linux-dvb-maintainer] " Holger Waechtler
2005-02-11 12:11 ` Andreas Oberritter
2006-01-06 0:35 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1108124605.3535.17.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=obi@linuxtv.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mws@twisted-brains.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox