From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: queue_work from interrupt Real time preemption2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.37-03
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:24:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1108416249.8413.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200502141240.14355.mgross@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 12:40 -0800, Mark Gross wrote:
> I'm working on a tweak to the preepmtive soft IRQ implementation using work
> queues and I'm having problems with a BUG assert when trying to queue_work.
>
> Souldn't I be able to call queue_work form ISR context?
Yes, but not with interrupts disabled.
>
> --mgross
>
> ---------------------------
> | preempt count: 00000001 ]
> | 1-level deep critical section nesting:
> ----------------------------------------
> .. [<c0140f5d>] .... print_traces+0x1d/0x60
> .....[<c01042a3>] .. ( <= dump_stack+0x23/0x30)
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context IRQ 20(2039) at kernel/rt.c
> in_atomic():0 [00000000], irqs_disabled():1
Here you have interrupts disabled. Since you are tweaking the softirq I
don't know your code, but the kernel should not schedule after turning
off interrupts, and the spinlocks under the PREEMPT kernel, may now
sleep (unless they are raw_spin_locks). Here we also see that
queue_work calls spin_lock_irqsave. I'm suspecting that you turned off
interrupts somewhere.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-14 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-14 20:40 queue_work from interrupt Real time preemption2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.37-03 Mark Gross
2005-02-14 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-02-14 22:29 ` Mark Gross
2005-02-15 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-15 18:06 ` Mark Gross
2005-02-16 5:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-16 16:11 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-16 17:59 ` George Anzinger
2005-02-16 22:55 ` Mark Gross
2005-02-16 18:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-02-17 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-17 15:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-02-17 7:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-17 14:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-02-17 16:14 ` Mark Gross
2005-03-29 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 18:41 ` Mark Gross
2005-04-01 5:55 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1108416249.8413.54.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox