public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cfq: depth 4 reached, tagging now on
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:10:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109106633.31071.20.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050221082044.GW4056@suse.de>

On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:20 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Starting around 2.6.11-rc4 I get this printk during the boot process
> > after kjournald starts, and again if I stress the filesystem.
> > 
> > cfq: depth 4 reached, tagging now on
> > 
> > Is this printk intentional?  I am sure users will wonder about it,
> > especially because (presumably) cfq turns tagging off at some point in
> > between, and doesn't say anything about it.
> 
> It is intentional, but could be supressed. But I'm wondering if the
> accounting change introduced a bug - what hardware are you using cfq on
> (ie does it actually do tagged command queueing, is it SCSI?)?
> 

Yes, this is an all SCSI system using the aic7xxx driver.

> It's a one-time message. CFQ starts out assuming the drive doesn't do
> TCQ, if the driver depth goes beyond a defined limit (4), it will assume
> that the hardware can do tagged queueing and change its internal
> accounting accordingly. The setting stays that way, it's not a
> transitional state.
> 


OK.  Then the multiple messages were CFQ enabling TCQ for the different
drives.

Lee


  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-22 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-19 20:59 cfq: depth 4 reached, tagging now on Lee Revell
2005-02-21  8:20 ` Jens Axboe
2005-02-22 21:10   ` Lee Revell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-04  8:52 Chuck Ebbert
2005-03-04  9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-04 20:33   ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1109106633.31071.20.camel@krustophenia.net \
    --to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox