From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cfq: depth 4 reached, tagging now on
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:10:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109106633.31071.20.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050221082044.GW4056@suse.de>
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:20 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Starting around 2.6.11-rc4 I get this printk during the boot process
> > after kjournald starts, and again if I stress the filesystem.
> >
> > cfq: depth 4 reached, tagging now on
> >
> > Is this printk intentional? I am sure users will wonder about it,
> > especially because (presumably) cfq turns tagging off at some point in
> > between, and doesn't say anything about it.
>
> It is intentional, but could be supressed. But I'm wondering if the
> accounting change introduced a bug - what hardware are you using cfq on
> (ie does it actually do tagged command queueing, is it SCSI?)?
>
Yes, this is an all SCSI system using the aic7xxx driver.
> It's a one-time message. CFQ starts out assuming the drive doesn't do
> TCQ, if the driver depth goes beyond a defined limit (4), it will assume
> that the hardware can do tagged queueing and change its internal
> accounting accordingly. The setting stays that way, it's not a
> transitional state.
>
OK. Then the multiple messages were CFQ enabling TCQ for the different
drives.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-22 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-19 20:59 cfq: depth 4 reached, tagging now on Lee Revell
2005-02-21 8:20 ` Jens Axboe
2005-02-22 21:10 ` Lee Revell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-04 8:52 Chuck Ebbert
2005-03-04 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-04 20:33 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1109106633.31071.20.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox