From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: More latency regressions with 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:10:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109189453.3174.23.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502231952250.14603@goblin.wat.veritas.com>
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 20:06 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:16 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm just about to test this patch below: please give it a try: thanks...
>
> I'm very sorry, there's two things wrong with that version: _must_
> increment addr before breaking out, and better to check after pte_none
> too (we can question whether it might be checking too often, but this
> replicates what Ingo was doing). Please replace by new patch below,
> which I'm now running through lmbench.
OK, I will report any interesting results with the new patch.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-23 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-23 18:07 More latency regressions with 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02 Lee Revell
2005-02-23 19:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-23 19:36 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-23 20:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-23 20:10 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-02-23 20:30 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-23 21:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-23 22:14 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-23 23:52 ` PPC RT Patch john cooper
2005-02-24 4:20 ` Frank Rowand
2005-02-24 13:56 ` john cooper
2005-02-23 23:27 ` More latency regressions with 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02 Nick Piggin
2005-02-24 1:03 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-24 1:29 ` Nick Piggin
2005-02-24 2:24 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-24 2:41 ` Nick Piggin
2005-02-24 3:03 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-23 20:53 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-23 22:13 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-24 4:56 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-24 6:32 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-24 8:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-25 3:30 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-25 5:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-25 15:02 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-23 19:52 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1109189453.3174.23.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox