public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fredrik Tolf <fredrik@dolda2000.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ipt_owner panic on 2.6.10-1.12_FC2
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:53:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109199189.15302.21.camel@pc7.dolda2000.com> (raw)

Hi!

On the Linux router I'm running, I use the ipt_owner iptables module,
and since a few kernel versions back, I've begun getting kernel panics
in the ipt_owner module.

Unfortunately, the start of it coincided with a CPU upgrade of the
router, so at first I thought it was a hardware failure. Therefore, I
didn't note on what kernel version it first started happening. This
kernel version is a stock Fedora Core 2 kernel from FC's yum repo,
2.6.10-1.12_FC2.

Anyhow, I'm getting this panic message:
Kernel panic - not syncing: net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_owner.c:38:
spin_lock(kernel/fork.c:ca2dc044) already locked by fs/file_table.c/153

I've got a long stack trace in the same photograph that I took of the
monitor. Please tell me if you want it. I've seen the file and source
line of the "already locked by" vary (such as "already locked by
fs/open.c/someline"... it was somewhere in sys_close() at that time), so
it doesn't seem to be depending on that.

Not sure if this is the kind of error that goes to the LKML. Please tell
me if I got it wrong.

Also, if anyone has the time, please clear up this confusion for me -- I
assume from the message that this panic is because one thread tries to
lock the same lock twice, but I've always thought that Linux spinlocks
are recursively lockable. Am I just wrong about them being recursively
lockable, or does this panic have another cause?

Thanks for your time!

Fredrik Tolf



                 reply	other threads:[~2005-02-23 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1109199189.15302.21.camel@pc7.dolda2000.com \
    --to=fredrik@dolda2000.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox