From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262895AbVCDMGV (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:06:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262851AbVCDLzI (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 06:55:08 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([213.162.118.85]:29676 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262906AbVCDLbG (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 06:31:06 -0500 From: Matthew Garrett To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050304112649.GQ1345@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1109811404.5918.80.camel@tyrosine> <20050304112649.GQ1345@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:30:57 +0000 Message-Id: <1109935857.5918.99.camel@tyrosine> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 213.162.118.93 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org Subject: Re: Scheduling while atomic errors on swsusp resume Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cavan.codon.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 12:26 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Well, those are warnings, so it still works, right? Aha, "exited with > preempt count 1" seems very wrong. Yes, please try this with > vanilla. I'm running 2.6.11 with Yeah, the resume script crashes, which is a bit of a problem. I'll get the user to try with a vanilla kernel, but I'm not having these problems with an identical kernel - it seems to be something specific to his setup. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org