public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] I/O-check interface for driver's error handling
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:27:07 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109978827.5680.324.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050304231807.GC2647@elf.ucw.cz>

On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 00:18 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On So 05-03-05 10:03:37, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 23:57 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > > What prevents driver from being run on another CPU, maybe just doing
> > > mdelay() between hardware accesses? 
> > 
> > Almost all drivers that I know have some sort of locking. Nothing nasty
> > about it. Besides, you can't expect everything to be as simple as
> > putting two bit of lego together, the problem isn't simple.
> 
> If error() is allowed to sleep, then yes, its probably easy enough. If
> it is not allowed to sleep, it will just postpone work to context that
> is allowed to sleep, and it will probably be okay, too.

Yes, it's my itend that the notification callback is to be called in a
task context where it can sleep.

> => there are some locking issues, but they are probably easy
> enough. Sorry for noise.
> 								Pavel
> 
-- 
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-05  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-01  8:33 [PATCH/RFC] I/O-check interface for driver's error handling Hidetoshi Seto
2005-03-01 14:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-03-01 19:27   ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-01 19:37     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-02  6:13     ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-03-02 19:20       ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-04  2:03         ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-03-04 16:46           ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-01 16:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-01 16:49   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-01 16:59     ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-03-01 17:10       ` Jesse Barnes
2005-03-01 18:33         ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-01 22:27           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-02 20:02             ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-02 22:46               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-02 23:37                 ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-01 22:23         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-02  3:13         ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-03-04 13:54         ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-04 17:50           ` Jesse Barnes
2005-03-04 22:37           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-04 22:57             ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-04 23:03               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-04 23:18                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-04 23:27                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-03-02  2:28       ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-03-02 17:44         ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-02 18:03           ` linux-os
2005-03-02 22:40             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-04  2:21           ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-03-01 22:20     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-02 18:22     ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-02 18:41       ` Jesse Barnes
2005-03-02 19:46         ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-02 22:43         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-02 22:41       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-02 23:30         ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-02 23:40           ` Jesse Barnes
2005-03-01 19:17   ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-01 22:15   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-01 17:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-01 18:08   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-01 18:45     ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-01 18:59     ` Linas Vepstas
2005-03-01 22:26     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-01 22:24   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-04 12:40 ` Hidetoshi Seto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1109978827.5680.324.camel@gaston \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linas@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox