From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"nicolinc@nvidia.com" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@linux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"lulu@redhat.com" <lulu@redhat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
"Martins, Joao" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/7] iommufd/selftest: Add test coverage for SIOV virtual device
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:48:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <110f5a3a-7f3f-4b82-bb12-c7ca5df5c98f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB5276A82597B194611BE01DFE8CCDA@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2023/10/10 16:30, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 4:51 PM
>>
>> @@ -2071,6 +2083,43 @@ TEST_F(iommufd_device_pasid, pasid_attach)
>>
>> IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_DATA_SELFTEST,
>> &data, sizeof(data));
>>
>> + if (variant->pasid) {
>> + uint32_t new_hwpt_id = 0;
>> +
>> + ASSERT_EQ(0,
>> + test_cmd_pasid_check_domain(self->fd,
>> + self->stdev_id,
>> + variant->pasid,
>> + self->hwpt_id,
>> + &result));
>> + EXPECT_EQ(1, result);
>> + test_cmd_hwpt_alloc(self->device_id, self->ioas_id,
>> + 0, &new_hwpt_id);
>> + test_cmd_mock_domain_replace(self->stdev_id,
>> + new_hwpt_id);
>> + ASSERT_EQ(0,
>> + test_cmd_pasid_check_domain(self->fd,
>> + self->stdev_id,
>> + variant->pasid,
>> + new_hwpt_id,
>> + &result));
>> + EXPECT_EQ(1, result);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Detach hwpt from variant->pasid, and check if the
>> + * variant->pasid has null domain
>> + */
>> + test_cmd_pasid_detach(variant->pasid);
>> + ASSERT_EQ(0,
>> + test_cmd_pasid_check_domain(self->fd,
>> + self->stdev_id,
>> + variant->pasid,
>> + 0, &result));
>> + EXPECT_EQ(1, result);
>> +
>> + test_ioctl_destroy(new_hwpt_id);
>> + }
>> +
>
> I wonder whether above better reuses the device attach/replace cases
> given default_pasid is hidden inside iommufd_device. this pasid_attach
> case is more for testing user pasids on a iommufd_device which hasn't
> yet been supported by SIOV device?
perhaps the way how the above code checks the attached domain misled you.
Actually, this is still testing the siov default_pasid. In the variant
setup, the default_pasid is passed to the testing driver when creating
the stdev. That's why the replace test does not require a pasid.
maybe I can let have a new selftest op to check attached domain for a given
stdev instead of reusing test_cmd_pasid_check_domain().
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-09 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 8:51 [RFC 0/7] Add SIOV virtual device support Yi Liu
2023-10-09 8:51 ` [RFC 1/7] iommufd: Handle unsafe interrupts in a separate function Yi Liu
2023-10-09 8:51 ` [RFC 2/7] iommufd: Introduce iommufd_alloc_device() Yi Liu
2023-10-09 8:51 ` [RFC 3/7] iommufd: Add iommufd_device_bind_pasid() Yi Liu
2023-10-10 8:19 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-11-08 7:45 ` Yi Liu
2023-11-08 8:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-11-08 9:03 ` Yi Liu
2023-10-09 8:51 ` [RFC 4/7] iommufd: Support attach/replace for SIOV virtual device {dev, pasid} Yi Liu
2023-10-10 8:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-11-09 8:21 ` Yi Liu
2023-10-09 8:51 ` [RFC 5/7] iommufd/selftest: Extend IOMMU_TEST_OP_MOCK_DOMAIN to pass in pasid Yi Liu
2023-10-10 8:25 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-10-09 8:51 ` [RFC 6/7] iommufd/selftest: Add test coverage for SIOV virtual device Yi Liu
2023-10-10 8:30 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-11-09 7:48 ` Yi Liu [this message]
2023-10-09 8:51 ` [RFC 7/7] vfio: Add vfio_register_pasid_iommu_dev() Yi Liu
2023-10-10 8:33 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-11-09 8:20 ` Yi Liu
2023-11-16 5:35 ` Cao, Yahui
2023-11-17 6:31 ` Yi Liu
[not found] ` <99115148-d0e3-4920-aed6-669ae45aa2fe@intel.com>
2023-11-17 6:30 ` Yi Liu
2023-10-09 13:21 ` [RFC 0/7] Add SIOV virtual device support Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-09 23:33 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-11-22 3:59 ` Cao, Yahui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=110f5a3a-7f3f-4b82-bb12-c7ca5df5c98f@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox