From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261252AbVCEUUo (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:20:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261191AbVCEUSS (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:18:18 -0500 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:21689 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261237AbVCEUFk (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:05:40 -0500 Subject: Unsupported PM cap regs version 1 From: Lee Revell To: linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 15:05:35 -0500 Message-Id: <1110053135.12513.7.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Every time I load the driver for my SBLive Platinum I get this log message: PCI: 0000:00:0f.0 has unsupported PM cap regs version (1) even though CONFIG_PM is not set. I see that this issue came up in January on LKML but there was no resolution. First, why don't we support PM cap regs versions other than 2? Second, why is this printk() necessary? If we really don't support older versions for a good reason, do we really need to constantly remind the user about it? Especially if power management is disabled? The overall effect is to give the user the impression that the hardware is somehow broken. Lee