From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261944AbVCHKRa (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 05:17:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261955AbVCHKR3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 05:17:29 -0500 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:8579 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261944AbVCHKRX (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 05:17:23 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel From: Alan Cox To: Greg KH Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050308053941.GA16450@kroah.com> References: <200503072216.j27MGxtP024504@hera.kernel.org> <20050308053941.GA16450@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1110276929.28860.93.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:15:30 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Was there a reason you did this without using tabs, like the rest of the > file? No but I'll send Linus an update to fix that now. > Again, the maintainer chain is well documented... Really - so does it go to the PCI maintainer, the IDE maintainer or the DRI maintainer or someone else, or all of them, or in bits to different ones remembering there are dependancies and I don't use bitcreeper ? Alan