public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/15] ptwalk: pagetable walker cleanup
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:39:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1110415184.32524.128.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503092201070.6070@goblin.wat.veritas.com>

On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 22:05 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Here's a cleanup of the pagetable walkers, in common and i386 code,
> based on 2.6.11-bk5.  Mainly to make them all go the same simpler way,
> so they're easier to follow with less room for error; but also to reduce
> the code size and speed it up a little.  These are janitorial changes,
> other arches may follow whenever it suits them.
>
> .../...

Do you have them on HTTP somewhere ? Apparently, a few of the 15 patches
didn't make it to me.

There are some other bugs introduced by set_pte_at() caused by latent
bugs in the PTE walkers that 'drop' part of the address along the way,
notably the vmalloc.c ones are bogus, thus breaking ppc/ppc64 in subtle
ways. Before I send patches, I'd rather check if it's not all fixed by
your patches first :)

Ben.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-10  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-09 22:05 [PATCH 0/15] ptwalk: pagetable walker cleanup Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:06 ` [PATCH 1/15] ptwalk: p?d_none_or_clear_bad Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:07 ` [PATCH 2/15] ptwalk: change_protection Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:08 ` [PATCH 3/15] ptwalk: sync_page_range Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:08 ` [PATCH 4/15] ptwalk: unuse_mm Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:09 ` [PATCH 5/15] ptwalk: map and unmap_vm_area Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:10 ` [PATCH 6/15] ptwalk: ioremap_page_range Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:10 ` [PATCH 7/15] ptwalk: remap_pfn_range Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:11 ` [PATCH 8/15] ptwalk: zeromap_page_range Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:12 ` [PATCH 9/15] ptwalk: unmap_page_range Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:12 ` [PATCH 10/15] ptwalk: copy_page_range Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:13 ` [PATCH 11/15] ptwalk: copy_pte_range hang Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 23:25   ` Nick Piggin
2005-03-09 22:14 ` [PATCH 12/15] ptwalk: clear_page_range Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:14 ` [PATCH 13/15] ptwalk: move p?d_none_or_clear_bad Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:15 ` [PATCH 14/15] ptwalk: inline pmd_range and pud_range Hugh Dickins
2005-03-09 22:16 ` [PATCH 15/15] ptwalk: pud and pmd folded Hugh Dickins
2005-03-10  0:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-03-10  1:02   ` [PATCH 0/15] ptwalk: pagetable walker cleanup David S. Miller
2005-03-10  1:08     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1110415184.32524.128.camel@gaston \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox