From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
Chris Morgan <cmorgan@alum.wpi.edu>,
paul@linuxaudiosystems.com, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: kernel bug: futex_wait hang
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:25:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1111465520.3058.29.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050321202051.2796660e.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 20:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> >
> > Paul Davis and Chris Morgan have been chasing down a problem with
> > xmms_jack and it really looks like this bug, thought to have been fixed
> > in 2.6.10, is the culprit.
> >
> > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0409.0/2044.html
> >
> > (for more info google "futex_wait 2.6 hang")
> >
> > It's simple to reproduce. Run JACK and launch xmms with the JACK output
> > plugin. Close XMMS. The xmms process hangs. Strace looks like this:
> >
> > rlrevell@krustophenia:~$ strace -p 7935
> > Process 7935 attached - interrupt to quit
> > futex(0xb5341bf8, FUTEX_WAIT, 7939, NULL
> >
> > Just like in the above bug report, if xmms is run with
> > LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19, it works perfectly.
> >
> > I have reproduced the bug with 2.6.12-rc1.
> >
>
> iirc we ended up deciding that the futex problems around that time were due
> to userspace problems (a version of libc). But then, there's no discussion
> around Seto's patch and it didn't get applied. So I don't know what
> happened to that work - it's all a bit mysterious.
>
It does seem like it could be a different problem. Maybe Paul can
provide some more evidence that it's a kernel and not a glibc/NPTL bug.
I'm really just posting this on Paul's behalf; I don't claim to
understand the issue. ;-)
> Is this a 100% repeatable hang, or is it some occasional race?
>
100% repeatable.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-22 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-22 3:59 kernel bug: futex_wait hang Lee Revell
2005-03-22 4:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22 4:25 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-03-22 4:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-03-22 4:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-03-22 5:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22 5:30 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-22 6:34 ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-03-22 23:58 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-23 13:12 ` paul
2005-03-23 13:43 ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-03-22 5:15 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-22 15:30 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-03-22 23:18 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1111465520.3058.29.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cmorgan@alum.wpi.edu \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paul@linuxaudiosystems.com \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox