public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] logdev debugging memory device for tough to debug areas
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:53:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1112097210.3691.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050329090707.GD7074@elte.hu>

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 11:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > I've created a tracing tool several years ago for my master's thesis 
> > against the 2.2 kernel and onto the 2.4 kernel. I'm currently using 
> > this in the 2.6 kernel to debug some customizations against Ingo's RT 
> > kernel.
> 
> neat. It seems there's some overlap with relayfs, which is in -mm 
> currently:
> 
>  http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc1/2.6.12-rc1-mm3/broken-out/relayfs.patch
> 

Thanks Ingo, I didn't know about this. I'll look into it further when I
have more time, and maybe my tools already implement things that need to
be done in here, and I can port them (if they're interested).  I first
wrote this back in 1998 or 1999 and have added on since then. So it is
pretty mature. Unfortunately I still had to clean it up for the post. It
was only for my personal use till someone mentioned to me that I should
share it.

Also, I'm almost done adding the pending owner work against .41-11. I
see you now have 41-13, and if you already implemented it, let me know.
I've been fighting your deadlock detection to make sure it works with
the changes. Then finally I found a race condition that I'm solving.

To have a task take back the ownership, I had the stealer call
task_blocks_on_lock on the task that it stole it from. To get this to
work, when a task is given the pending ownership, it doesn't NULL the
blocked_on at that point (although the waiter->task is set to NULL). But
this gives the race condition in pi_setprio where it checks for
p->blocked_on still exists. Reason is that I don't want the waking up of
a process to call any more locks. To solve this, I had to (and this is
what I don't like right now) add another flag for the process called
PF_BLOCKED. So that this can tell the pi_setprio when to stop. This flag
is set in task_blocks_on_lock and cleared in pick_new_owner where the
setting of blocked_on to NULL use to be.

Unless you already implemented this, I'll have a patch for you to look
at later today, and you can then (if you want) critique it :-)

-- Steve



  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-29 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-22  0:39 [RFC] logdev debugging memory device for tough to debug areas Steven Rostedt
2005-03-29  9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-29 11:53   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-03-29 11:56     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-29 12:12       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1112097210.3691.51.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox