From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
Cc: "Richard B. Johnson" <linux-os@analogic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 12:43:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1115311419.9901.57.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050505081250.GB24187@lug-owl.de>
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 10:12 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-04 14:23:36 -0400, Richard B. Johnson <linux-os@analogic.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 May 2005, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>
> > >Well, why should someone use a broken mail service at all?
> >
> > Because the net Nazis make often make it the only way to send/receive
> > mail in a domain. There is nothing coming or going here that doesn't
> > go through a M$ mail-killer that even saves every thread of evidence.
>
> No way to send emails with a locally installed email client? There are
> so many, even for Windows. ...and I guess quite some of those can be
> configured to produce real emails, not only bullshit...
Hell no. You think any sane admin is going to let every workstation on
the corporate network make outgoing port 25 connections to wherever they
want?
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-05 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-04 17:01 [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy Dave Hansen
2005-05-04 17:10 ` Jon Smirl
2005-05-04 17:54 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-05-04 18:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-05-05 8:12 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-05-05 16:43 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-05-05 17:31 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-05-04 20:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-05-04 17:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-05-04 17:16 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-05-04 17:25 ` Dave Hansen
2005-05-04 17:55 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-04 18:14 ` Dave Hansen
2005-05-04 19:21 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-05-05 19:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-04 17:58 ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-05-04 18:52 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-05-04 19:28 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-05-14 22:10 ` Domen Puncer
2005-05-04 17:59 ` John W. Linville
2005-05-05 1:09 ` Rik van Riel
2005-05-05 9:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-05-05 10:06 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-05-05 12:01 ` Paulo Marques
2005-05-05 21:34 ` Steven Cole
2005-05-06 1:31 ` Lee Revell
2005-05-06 4:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
[not found] <40vxU-1a1-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <40vRd-1os-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-05-05 2:36 ` Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1115311419.9901.57.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox