From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262000AbVELPDb@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262000AbVELPDb (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 12 May 2005 11:03:31 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262008AbVELPDa
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 12 May 2005 11:03:30 -0400
Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:58295 "HELO
	viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S262000AbVELPD3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 12 May 2005 11:03:29 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] adjust i386 watchdog tick calculation
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <s2831ed8.056@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
References: <s2831ed8.056@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:03:27 -0400
Message-Id: <1115910208.20909.16.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 10:16 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get
> line wrapped.)

You have a novell.com address, why don't you just use Evolution?  It
*never* mangles inline patches.

Lee