public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
Cc: steve <lingxiang@huawei.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"zhangtiger@huawei.com" <zhangtiger@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: why nfs server delay 10ms in nfsd_write()?
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:59:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1116511140.21587.4.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <428C8C32.2030803@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 08:53 -0400, Peter Staubach wrote:
> There are certainly many others way to get gathering, without adding an
> artificial delay.  There are already delay slots built into the code 
> which could
> be used to trigger the gathering, so with a little bit different 
> architecture, the
> performance increases could be achieved.
> 
> Some implementations actually do write gathering with NFSv3, even.  Is
> this interesting enough to play with?  I suspect that just doing the 
> work for
> NFSv2 is not...

Also, how do you explain the big performance hit that steve observed?
Write gathering is supposed to help performance, but it's a big loss on
his test...

Lee


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-19 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-19  2:46 why nfs server delay 10ms in nfsd_write()? steve
2005-05-19  3:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-05-19  3:13 ` Lee Revell
2005-05-19 12:53   ` Peter Staubach
2005-05-19 13:26     ` Trond Myklebust
2005-05-19 13:41       ` Peter Staubach
2005-05-19 13:59     ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-05-19 14:10       ` Peter Staubach
2005-05-19 14:13       ` Avi Kivity
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-20 10:44 steve
2005-05-20 13:05 ` Peter Staubach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1116511140.21587.4.camel@mindpipe \
    --to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=lingxiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=staubach@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhangtiger@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox