From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: omb@bluewin.ch
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 16:31:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1116793873.30456.0.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4290E466.5040907@khandalf.com>
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 21:58 +0200, Brian O'Mahoney wrote:
> There is NO Question(TM), the DPA is about the privacy, appropriateness,
> accuracy of private data and the way that data can be used by government
> or industry, and I can see no reason why anyone should remove
> 'sign-offs' or other identification in the original e-mail which forms
> part of the original communication, if legal advice was received to
> the contrary it is _plain_wrong_; (for example we could not store e-mail
> sent to us, which is often mandatory to the proper conduct of business).
>
> Copyright law is complicated, since it differs in the UK, EU and non EU
> contries, such as Switzerland; so in the UK copyright automatically
> persists in anything I write, in the US it dosn't, BUT, if a Bern
> Convention copyright notice is included, eg:
>
Are you a lawyer? I think "copyright automatically persists in anything
you write" in the US as well.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-22 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200505220008.j4M08uE9025378@hera.kernel.org>
2005-05-22 11:57 ` When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip David Woodhouse
2005-05-22 12:59 ` Russell King
2005-05-22 13:23 ` David Woodhouse
2005-05-22 13:41 ` Russell King
2005-05-22 14:14 ` David Woodhouse
2005-05-22 21:16 ` Alan Cox
2005-05-22 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-22 22:22 ` Alan Cox
2005-05-22 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-22 22:43 ` Alan Cox
2005-05-23 4:09 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-05-23 5:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-05-23 7:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-05-23 14:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-22 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-22 17:15 ` David Woodhouse
2005-05-22 18:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-22 18:44 ` Russell King
2005-05-22 18:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-22 19:03 ` Russell King
2005-05-22 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-22 20:55 ` Brian O'Mahoney
2005-05-22 19:58 ` Brian O'Mahoney
2005-05-22 20:31 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-05-22 20:48 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1116793873.30456.0.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omb@bluewin.ch \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox