Re: RT patch acceptance

Andrea Arcangeli
2005-05-27T16:35:46Z

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Or change (almost) all calls to might_sleep() into calls to
> cond_reched(), and put a might_sleep() inside cond_reched().

indeed

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0407.1/1422.html

Who on earth would ever compile a kernel with PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=n?
That's just a marketing word and useless config option as far as I can
tell. Anyway it's just source code overhead, at runtime the code is the
same, so I don't care after all.