From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261951AbVFGSBk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:01:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261932AbVFGSBk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:01:40 -0400 Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:52918 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261926AbVFGSBg (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:01:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device From: James Bottomley To: Denis Zaitsev Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel , SCSI Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050607191646.A30496@ward.six> References: <20050606141638.A28532@ward.six> <1118045986.5652.21.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050606150321.A817@ward.six> <1118068477.5045.27.camel@mulgrave> <20050607191646.A30496@ward.six> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:37:03 -0400 Message-Id: <1118162223.4813.40.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 19:16 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote: > It seems that things are in order, do I understand right? So, why and > how the low-level format affects the old driver's behaviour? I can't answer that ... part of the reason for ditching the in-driver aic7xxx DV is that it was where an astonishing number of bugs kept turning up. James