From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262595AbVFJQQe (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:16:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262597AbVFJQQe (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:16:34 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:20930 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262595AbVFJQQc (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:16:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64 From: Dave Kleikamp To: Alex Deucher Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List , ag@m-cam.com In-Reply-To: References: <1118412882.7944.6.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:16:30 -0500 Message-Id: <1118420190.21406.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 12:09 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > 1.1.8 segfaulted as well. Hmm. This bothers me. > running fsck.jfs --omit_journal_replay did the trick! thanks, Well, at least it got you going again. :^) Thanks, Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center