From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>, Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com,
dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Flames go here (was Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:00:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1118444440.6423.125.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050610225231.GF6564@g5.random>
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 00:52 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:37:24PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> > Some of the comments from various folks are just intolerably paranoid
>
> Just tell me how can you go to a customer and tell him that your
> linux-RTOS has a guaranteed worst case latency of 50usec. How can you
> tell that? Did you exercise all possible scheduler paths with cache
> disabled and calculated the worst case latency with rdtsc + math?
>
> Why do you take risks when you can go with much more relaible solutions
> like RTAI and rtlinux?
This thread is converging back to the original "RT patch acceptance"
thread. I've changed the subject line so people can distinguish the
content from the flames.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-10 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-08 2:26 Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-08 3:00 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-08 14:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-08 16:51 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-09 2:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-09 11:20 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-06-08 18:46 ` Chris Friesen
2005-06-08 19:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 22:25 ` Eric Piel
2005-06-10 23:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 23:23 ` Eric Piel
2005-06-11 0:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 1:38 ` Eric Piel
2005-06-11 1:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-09 23:34 ` Tim Bird
2005-06-09 23:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 2:59 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-10 15:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 17:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 19:39 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 19:41 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-10 20:26 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-10 22:37 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 22:43 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 22:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 23:00 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-06-10 23:08 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 23:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-11 1:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 1:50 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-11 2:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 15:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-11 21:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 23:48 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-12 17:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-12 21:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 1:35 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 14:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 19:49 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 20:03 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-13 20:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 20:26 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 20:23 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-13 20:28 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-13 22:00 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 22:11 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 22:18 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-13 22:28 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 22:29 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-13 22:55 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-14 1:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-06-14 2:07 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-14 2:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-06-14 2:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-06-14 3:24 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-14 16:41 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2005-06-14 19:20 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-14 19:35 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-06-14 21:29 ` Gene Heskett
2005-06-14 20:19 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2005-06-14 7:00 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2005-06-14 16:09 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2005-06-14 16:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-13 20:38 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-13 20:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 20:31 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-13 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-13 20:34 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13 21:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-12 17:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-12 18:43 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-12 19:12 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-11 5:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 17:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 20:22 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-10 20:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-10 21:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 22:19 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 22:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 22:49 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-10 23:01 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 23:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-10 23:15 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 23:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 23:26 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 23:36 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-06-10 23:41 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-10 23:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-11 1:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 15:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-11 20:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-11 0:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-10 20:38 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-10 23:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1118444440.6423.125.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
--cc=bruce@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=karim@opersys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
--cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox