Re: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1

Nick Piggin
2005-06-11T07:44:46Z

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> could you send me the .config you used for the PREEMPT_RT tests? Also,
> you used -47-08, which was well prior the current round of performance
> improvements, so you might want to re-run with something like -48-06 or
> better.
>

The other thing that would be really interesting is to test latencies
of various other kernel functionalities in the RT kernel (eg. message
passing, maybe pipe or localhost read/write, signals, fork/clone/exit,
mmap/munmap, faulting in shared memory, or whatever else is important
to the RT crowd).

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com