From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261482AbVFOCuN (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:50:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261483AbVFOCuN (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:50:13 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:30385 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261482AbVFOCuJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:50:09 -0400 Subject: Re: RT and kernel debugger ( 2.6.12rc6 + RT > 48-00 ) From: Lee Revell To: Serge Noiraud Cc: linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <1118673083.10717.83.camel@ibiza.btsn.frna.bull.fr> References: <1118673083.10717.83.camel@ibiza.btsn.frna.bull.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:50:49 -0400 Message-Id: <1118800250.6093.61.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 16:31 +0200, Serge Noiraud wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know what kernel debugger you propose over the RT > patch. I used to test kgdb, but since spinlock modification, it doesn't > work anymore. > > Does someone work over RT to port a kernel debugger ? I got kdb to work a few months ago. I might have only been using PREEMPT_DESKTOP + irq threading + hard/softirq preemption. All that was needed are some trivial adjustments to get the patch to apply. Lee