Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal

Mika Penttilä
2005-06-11T17:31:10Z

Daniel Walker wrote:

>On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Mika Penttil� wrote:
>
>
>>Not with !softirq_preemption, then we take the immediate path and
>>process soft irqs on irq exit.
>>
>>
>
>My changes aren't used in that case.
>
>Daniel
>
>
>
>
ok, so maybe the safe way is to enforce threaded softirq with the soft
irq flag.

--Mika