From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261834AbVFQXcg@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261834AbVFQXcg (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:32:36 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261181AbVFQXcf
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:32:35 -0400
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.198]:59118 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261837AbVFQXXC (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:23:02 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:subject:from:reply-to:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ANu0lOxo7NzHeDVP4WC5X+PH3yM614DUayPSpP7CEmVca/hDP2/UvHgsMEq59L98ZSCagb7AlBshZ7jHWta7luX9w4e3/jX63Vb+5xwbZpeZnOYeyUdcu96fRtGMHWJGUsvoedsyOmAERwZgV5pS1gKa3oIQMc9ayLRZGxfA0ok=
Subject: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
From: Islam Amer <pharon@gmail.com>
Reply-To: pharon@gmail.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 02:22:45 +0300
Message-Id: <1119050565.5156.8.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

So is this the right place to ask about the cp1256 nls module? or am I
supposed to open a bug on bugzilla and assign it to the filesystem
people?