From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262178AbVFRWQE (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:16:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262173AbVFRWQE (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:16:04 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:45970 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262184AbVFRWPv (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:15:51 -0400 Subject: Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad? From: Lee Revell To: David L Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:18:44 -0400 Message-Id: <1119133125.4560.43.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 14:59 -0700, David L wrote: > I'm seeing the message: > > bad: scheduling while atomic! It indicates a kernel bug, which could range from harmless to very bad. Usually that message is accompanied by a stack trace, can you provide a real log excerpt? Lee