From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262133AbVFUPoW (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:44:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262130AbVFUPlu (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:41:50 -0400 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:25755 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262135AbVFUPk5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:40:57 -0400 Subject: Re: Bug in pcmcia-core From: Lee Revell To: James Courtier-Dutton Cc: Wakko Warner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <42B27D51.4040407@superbug.demon.co.uk> References: <42B1FF2A.2080608@superbug.demon.co.uk> <20050617014820.GA15045@animx.eu.org> <42B27D51.4040407@superbug.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:43:14 -0400 Message-Id: <1119368594.19357.22.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 08:35 +0100, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > > > > I thought drivers for the cardbus cards were the same as standard PCI cards. > > I know that as far as networking goes, the same driver runs a cardbus 3com > > 3c575 and the pci 3c905. Same with netgear's cardbus FA510 and PCI FA310. > > > > I'm not a kernel developer, but this is what I've understood. > > > > That is also what I thought. But I think that the cardbus 3com 3c575 > uses memory for io and not ioports. I think the problem is related to > the use of ioports on an cardbus card. Any update on this? Is the PCMCIA layer really unmaintained? Are we hosed? A quick grep of the subjects in my LKML folder for "PCMCIA" is certainly not encouraging. I see lots of questions along the lines of "did ANYONE EVER get this to work?" with no replies... Lee