From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262546AbVFVXMX (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:12:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262557AbVFVXIx (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:08:53 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:54955 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262515AbVFVXDo (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:03:44 -0400 Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2 From: Lee Revell To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Karim Yaghmour , Bill Huey , Kristian Benoit , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, rpm@xenomai.org In-Reply-To: <20050622220428.GA28906@elte.hu> References: <1119287612.6863.1.camel@localhost> <20050620183115.GA27028@nietzsche.lynx.com> <42B98B20.7020304@opersys.com> <20050622192927.GA13817@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20050622200554.GA16119@elte.hu> <42B9CC98.1040402@opersys.com> <20050622220428.GA28906@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:03:42 -0400 Message-Id: <1119481422.25270.11.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 00:04 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > if you want to be fair, you should > compare it to the SMP kernel Well, if you want to be even more fair, you could hold off on publishing benchmark results that compare an experimental, not fully debugged feature with a mature technology. Lee