From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261935AbVFWD5f (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:57:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262029AbVFWD5f (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:57:35 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:52945 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261935AbVFWD5a (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:57:30 -0400 Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2 From: Lee Revell To: karim@opersys.com Cc: Ingo Molnar , Bill Huey , Kristian Benoit , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, rpm@xenomai.org In-Reply-To: <42BA1850.4060505@opersys.com> References: <1119287612.6863.1.camel@localhost> <20050620183115.GA27028@nietzsche.lynx.com> <42B98B20.7020304@opersys.com> <20050622192927.GA13817@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20050622200554.GA16119@elte.hu> <42B9CC98.1040402@opersys.com> <20050622220428.GA28906@elte.hu> <42B9F673.4040100@opersys.com> <20050623000607.GB11486@elte.hu> <42BA069D.20208@opersys.com> <20050623013451.GA14137@elte.hu> <42BA1850.4060505@opersys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:57:21 -0400 Message-Id: <1119499041.25270.38.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 22:02 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > OK, please recheck the webpage, I've now added a warning specifically > to the effect that the numbers need to be rerun. Hopefully this clears > things up. Are you talking about the first run where you left all those expensive PREEMPT_RT debug options enabled? IMHO those numbers should be taken down, they're completely meaningless. Lee