From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263190AbVFXTdK (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:33:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263215AbVFXTdI (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:33:08 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:58038 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263190AbVFXT3O (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:29:14 -0400 Subject: Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD) From: Lee Revell To: Jan Beulich Cc: jmerkey , Christoph Lameter , Clyde Griffin , "John W. Linville" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <42BBC297020000780001D4A5@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> References: <20050624003515.GB28077@tuxdriver.com> <42BB510B.5080500@utah-nac.org> <42BBC297020000780001D4A5@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:29:09 -0400 Message-Id: <1119641349.3290.39.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 08:21 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > While I never used or saw kdb, I'd be curious about what you immediately saw missing... Um, you guys developed your own kernel debugger without looking at KDB first? How would you know you're not just reinventing the wheel? Lee