Re: [PATCH] [11/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 401-e820-table-support.patch

Nigel Cunningham
2005-07-06T05:23:06Z

Hi.

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 13:35, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>
> > diff -ruNp 402-mtrr-remove-sysdev.patch-old/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c 402-mtrr-remove-sysdev.patch-new/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
> > --- 402-mtrr-remove-sysdev.patch-old/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c 2005-06-20 11:46:42.000000000 +1000
> > +++ 402-mtrr-remove-sysdev.patch-new/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c 2005-07-04 23:14:19.000000000 +1000
> > @@ -166,7 +166,6 @@ static void ipi_handler(void *info)
> > atomic_dec(&data->count);
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > }
> > -
> > #endif
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -560,7 +559,7 @@ struct mtrr_value {
> >
> > static struct mtrr_value * mtrr_state;
> >
> > -static int mtrr_save(struct sys_device * sysdev, u32 state)
> > +int mtrr_save(void)
> > {
> > int i;
> > int size = num_var_ranges * sizeof(struct mtrr_value);
> > @@ -580,28 +579,27 @@ static int mtrr_save(struct sys_device *
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Isn't this covered by Shaohua Li's patch?

I believe so, but Shaohua Li's patch isn't merged in 2.6.12 (is it yet
at all). This is the solution I've been using for... can't remember how
long.

Thanks for the feedback.

Regards,

Nigel

--
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.