Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12

Nigel Cunningham
2005-07-07T00:29:55Z

Hi again.

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Is swsusp1 expected to be functional after these are applied? You
> removed *some* of its hooks, but not all, so I'm confused.

I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
What would you like to see happen?

Regards,

Nigel
--
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.