Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12

Nigel Cunningham
2005-07-08T22:28:58Z

Hi.

On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 23:30, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > Right, so you support the resume from disk trigger in sysfs and the
> > /proc/acpi/sleep interface? If suspend2 is a complete dropin replacement
> > then I'm much happier with the idea of dropping swsusp, but I don't want
> > to have to tie suspend/resume scripts to kernel versions.
>
> JFTR: i second this. There is already enough hackery involved if one
> wants to provide a smooth user experience ;-)

Consider it promised, and feel free to poke me if I forget! (That said,
I won't now!).

Regards,

Nigel
--
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.