From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261484AbVGGVX7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:23:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261545AbVGGVVm (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:21:42 -0400 Received: from [203.171.93.254] ([203.171.93.254]:1163 "EHLO cunningham.myip.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261345AbVGGVU2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:20:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12 From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: ncunningham@cyclades.com To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Matthew Garrett , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200507072054.51480.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <11206164393426@foobar.com> <1120738525.4860.1433.camel@localhost> <200507072054.51480.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Cycades Message-Id: <1120771312.4860.1569.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 07:21:52 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi. On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 04:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday, 7 of July 2005 14:49, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > >> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing > > >> it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning. > > > > > > I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to > > > ram - just the suspend to disk part. > > > > Right, so you support the resume from disk trigger in sysfs and the > > /proc/acpi/sleep interface? If suspend2 is a complete dropin replacement > > then I'm much happier with the idea of dropping swsusp, but I don't want > > to have to tie suspend/resume scripts to kernel versions. > > I don't think that swsusp can be replaced with suspend2 right now. First, > swsusp works on x86-64, and the support in suspend2 is preliminary, > AFAIK. Second, the IA64 support for swsusp is in the works, and it is not supported > by suspend2. > > Please don't plan to drop swsusp until you are able to replace it _completely_. Fair enough. I didn't realise Pavel had IA64 support too :> Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened.