From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261663AbVGHV35 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 17:29:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262856AbVGHV2c (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 17:28:32 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]:14509 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261663AbVGHV1U (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 17:27:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=lGD5RArgLO5+RfOiCb4EOSgpZqOpA5BhF1Luonkq6PN31BXRf56UpuIppcnqkohcOL3ILi8rP/iQo5F2Cp+WUa207p1uRwaGg2DBftZhlJdaphVB1vN3kn8xEL7bLKYFhnczH++Cy5Bl8LFgx11RynOL2b+o3gfBjJjU23suOZQ= Subject: Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.12-ck3 From: Kerin Millar To: Rudo Thomas Cc: Con Kolivas , ck list , linux kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <20050708202753.GA32317@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz> References: <200506301241.00593.kernel@kolivas.org> <20050704091648.GA14759@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20050707213034.GA9306@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <200507081352.55660.kernel@kolivas.org> <20050708202753.GA32317@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:31:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1120858280.22079.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 22:27 +0200, Rudo Thomas wrote: > > > > Time seems to pass very fast with this kernel. > > > > > > Am I the only one who gets this strange behaviour? Kernel's notion of > > > time seems to be about 30 times faster than real time. > > > > Sorry I really have no idea. If you can retest with latest stable mainline > > that this kernel is based on (2.6.12.2) and reproduce the problem > > The following one-liner (from 2.6.12.2) seems to be the problem: > > diff -urN linux-2.6.12-ck2-rudo/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c linux-2.6.12-ck-rudo/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c > --- linux-2.6.12-ck2-rudo/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c 2005-07-08 10:16:53.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.12-ck-rudo/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c 2005-07-03 21:06:10.000000000 +0200 > @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ > /* Interrupt Line values above 0xF are forbidden */ > if (dev->irq >= 0 && (dev->irq <= 0xF)) { > printk(" - using IRQ %d\n", dev->irq); > + acpi_register_gsi(dev->irq, ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE, ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW); > return_VALUE(0); > } > else { > Hi, could you try the following patch please? http://www.kernel.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=44f8e1a20cf3afe10a3744bd9317808a39a242bb Cheers, --Kerin Millar