From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262937AbVGHW26 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 18:28:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262934AbVGHW06 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 18:26:58 -0400 Received: from [203.171.93.254] ([203.171.93.254]:26831 "EHLO cunningham.myip.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262925AbVGHWZs (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 18:25:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12 From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: ncunningham@cyclades.com To: Stefan Seyfried Cc: Matthew Garrett , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <42CE8005.8020108@suse.de> References: <11206164393426@foobar.com> <20050706082230.GF1412@elf.ucw.cz> <20050706082230.GF1412@elf.ucw.cz> <1120696047.4860.525.camel@localhost> <1120738525.4860.1433.camel@localhost> <42CE8005.8020108@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Cycades Message-Id: <1120861635.7716.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 08:27:15 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi. On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 23:30, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > Right, so you support the resume from disk trigger in sysfs and the > > /proc/acpi/sleep interface? If suspend2 is a complete dropin replacement > > then I'm much happier with the idea of dropping swsusp, but I don't want > > to have to tie suspend/resume scripts to kernel versions. > > JFTR: i second this. There is already enough hackery involved if one > wants to provide a smooth user experience ;-) Consider it promised, and feel free to poke me if I forget! (That said, I won't now!). Regards, Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened.