From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261341AbVGKNW3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:22:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261664AbVGKNW3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:22:29 -0400 Received: from [81.2.110.250] ([81.2.110.250]:27853 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261341AbVGKNWQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:22:16 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt From: Alan Cox To: Andrew Morton Cc: Chris Wedgwood , Linux Kernel Mailing List , torvalds@osdl.org, christoph@lameter.org In-Reply-To: <20050708145953.0b2d8030.akpm@osdl.org> References: <200506231828.j5NISlCe020350@hera.kernel.org> <20050708214908.GA31225@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050708145953.0b2d8030.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1121087925.7407.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:18:51 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Gwe, 2005-07-08 at 22:59, Andrew Morton wrote: > Chris Wedgwood wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:28:47AM -0700, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > ^^^^^^ > > It's been over two weeks and nobody has complained about anything. Then your mail system is faulty because I did. 1000Hz is good for multmedia, 100Hz is good for power management/older boxes, 250Hz is too fast for some laptop APM to avoid clock slew, too fast for power saving and too slow for some multimedia weenies.