From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261181AbVGLGe2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 02:34:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261192AbVGLGe2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 02:34:28 -0400 Received: from b3162.static.pacific.net.au ([203.143.238.98]:27869 "EHLO cunningham.myip.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261181AbVGLGe1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 02:34:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12 From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: ncunningham@cyclades.com To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050710230645.GD513@infradead.org> References: <11206164393426@foobar.com> <20050710230645.GD513@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Cycades Message-Id: <1121150172.13869.17.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:36:12 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi. On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 09:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This submissions is completely useless. 48 patches without description > and a subbject lines that hides the little information even more. Yes. My mistake with the subject lines. Sorry. I'll also add better descriptions when I repost. > Please start again, and only with useful patches that on their own, > against -mm and with detailed explanations of each patch. First I'll act on feedback from this round. Regarding diffing against -mm, I though Andrew wanted patches against Linus' tree. I'm happy to do both. Andrew? Regards, Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened.