From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262503AbVGLXDx (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:03:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262448AbVGLXBs (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:01:48 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:64504 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262465AbVGLXBl (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:01:41 -0400 Subject: RT and XFS From: Daniel Walker Reply-To: dwalker@mvista.com To: mingo@elte.hu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: MontaVista Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:01:32 -0700 Message-Id: <1121209293.26644.8.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is there something so odd about the XFS locking, that it can't use the rt_lock ? --- linux.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/mrlock.h +++ linux/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/mrlock.h @@ -37,12 +37,12 @@ enum { MR_NONE, MR_ACCESS, MR_UPDATE }; typedef struct { - struct rw_semaphore mr_lock; - int mr_writer; + struct compat_rw_semaphore mr_lock; + int mr_writer; } mrlock_t;