From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262152AbVGMSJ7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:09:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261539AbVGMSI6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:08:58 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:59321 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262152AbVGMSFt (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:05:49 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.13-rc3 From: Lee Revell To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <1121275893.4435.47.camel@mindpipe> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:05:48 -0400 Message-Id: <1121277948.4435.57.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 10:51 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 22:05 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > I think the shortlog speaks for itself. > > > > HZ still defaults to 250. As was explained in another thread, this will > > break apps like MIDI sequencers and won't really save much battery > > power. > > Stop bothering with this, I've seen the thread, and no, I disagree totally > with "as explained in another thread". That's simply not true. > > The only thing that is true is that 100Hz is too low for some use, and > 1000Hz is too high for some uses. NOBODY has shown that 250Hz isn't good > enough, there's only been people whining and complaining and saying it > might not be. OK, point taken, I'm done with this issue as far as LKML is concerned. Anyone who wants to discuss this further can come over to the linux-audio-dev list. Lee